The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.2.18 (Linux)
|
Thought some might like to see the new truck! - Printable Version +- Carolina Broncos (https://cb4x4.com) +-- Forum: 66-96 Ford Broncos (https://cb4x4.com/forum-7.html) +--- Forum: Bronco Talk (https://cb4x4.com/forum-39.html) +---- Forum: Non Bronco Tech/Talk (https://cb4x4.com/forum-8.html) +---- Thread: Thought some might like to see the new truck! (/thread-389.html) |
Thought some might like to see the new truck! - johnpaulgolf - 04-24-2008 mooker82 Wrote:125hp not enough? It is slow but I wouldnt want to go much faster anyways. How many HP's does you Bronco have? Thats what I want to hear about. :thefinger::hysterical: Thought some might like to see the new truck! - broncomatt - 04-24-2008 I went overboard, 69 302 block, 40 over w/trd pistons, 66 289 heads with clevland vavles(reworked at dutchers machine), cam is simular to the edelbrock performer rpm, compression ratio is 10.5-11 to 1. MSD ignition, holly truck avenger, edelbrock waterpump, long tube headers with flowmasters. When we built it Dutcher caculated about 400hp. :beer: In hind sight I wish I had put a pinto motor in, would be better on gas(it only runs on super):crying: With the manual vavle body in my c4 you can realy feel it, and as my engin instuctor taught us. There is no substitute for cubic inches:thefinger: Broncomatt |