04-07-2008, 09:15 PM
chuzie Wrote:Is this the first MRI you have had since you got the Tatts?
Once this is all done I would certainly consider a few thoughts.
1.) Was the tatt ink defective? If so, you may be able to seek reimbursement from the artist for the removal of the tatts if such a procedure turns out to be necessary. I will tell you why in a second.not that I know of
2.) The tech that administered your MRI certainly asked you if you had any funky ink that would get blitzed by their MRI, right? If not, they may need to reimburse you for the removal procedure if it turns out to be necessary. This is not their first rodeo and this is not a unique situation.they asked if I had metal in the body or on the body(didn't know about metal in the ink)
3.) Or just tell me to shut the heck up and quit rambling on about getting legal with nice people.
"shut the heck up and quit rambling"
Here is the deal, tatts were not regulated until about 20 years ago. Some metals were used in tatt ink until the regulation began but even by that point it was still rare. My concern is whether or not the regulation of tatts prohibits the use of such inks and, if so, your artist was wrong to use that ink. Regardless, your MRI tech should have informed you of the risks. This tatt was visible at both times.
Just my 2 cents
you got too many font,colors in your text...pain when I wanna quote ya c'mon.
77 built 306,Trickflow Cam/Alum Heads/dome pistons/10:1comp,nv3550,duff long arms,3.5" lift,family cage,protofab rear bumper,twin sticked, and 35KM2'sG.D.I.