The perfect hunting truck.

[cuz1]

My fab guy took a Bronco II and made it a truck. It also has a 302 in it. Pretty cool! He will sell it for $2500.00

[NicksTrix]

wouldn't that be the same as a 4wd short box ranger?

[JayT]

"same" as a FSB with the top off = an F150, in my mind... I also don't think they offered a 302 in a Ranger until after the BII production ended. I'll go with "No, not the same, but very similar...", and could be corrected.

[cuz1]

the bed is about 4'0" deep

[Badhorsey]

Any more pics?

[trkbilder]

"same" as a FSB with the top off = an F150, in my mind... I also don't think they offered a 302 in a Ranger until after the BII production ended. I'll go with "No, not the same, but very similar...", and could be corrected.

"Corrected" Why? That is exactly what a lot of BII owners want to do to theirs, me included. If I had the $$$ it would be mine,as is!!!:xyxthumbs:

[dirty_sohc]

"same" as a FSB with the top off = an F150, in my mind... I also don't think they offered a 302 in a Ranger until after the BII production ended. I'll go with "No, not the same, but very similar...", and could be corrected.

The 302 was never offered int eh Ranger. The largest engine ever in a production ranger was the SOHC 4.0. The explorer recieved the 302, then later the Sport Tracs got the 4.6.

The Bronco II has a shorter wheelbase than even the short bed ranger. It can be very versatile in this configuration. There were conversion kits offered for just this in the 80's and 90's.

And a FSB without the top does not make an F150. Again shorter wheel base than the short bed F150 and it creates and open air enviroment with seating for 5, 6 if you have the bench seat.

[josephitguy]

... 5, 6 if you have the bench seat.

Maybe kids, I can fit 3 people my size in my Bronco, top on or not. :hysterical: